Writ filed in SC against ban on unregistered social media in Nepal
It asserts that such rights are essential pillars of a democratic society and must be protected at all costs.
KATHMANDU: A writ petition has been filed at the Supreme Court challenging the Nepal government’s recent decision to ban social media platforms that are not registered in the country.
Senior Advocate Dinesh Tripathi lodged the petition on Friday, claiming that the decision is unconstitutional and poses a serious threat to citizens’ fundamental rights. “I have already submitted the writ, and it is currently under the registration process,” Tripathi confirmed.
The petition argues that the government’s move infringes upon the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of Nepal, particularly the rights to freedom of thought, expression, and communication.
It asserts that such rights are essential pillars of a democratic society and must be protected at all costs.
In his writ, Tripathi has demanded an interim order from the Supreme Court, directing the authorities not to obstruct the use or operation of any social media platforms, irrespective of their registration status.
The government’s decision, announced just a day earlier, mandates a ban on all social media platforms that are not officially registered in Nepal.
The move has sparked widespread criticism from civil society, digital rights activists, and the general public, who argue that it undermines digital freedom and could lead to excessive censorship.
Critics warn that such measures could have chilling effects on freedom of expression in the digital space, limiting citizens’ ability to communicate, organize, and share information freely.
