Teachers’ Federation demands withdrawal of school policy provisions
In a statement issued this week, the Federation specifically denounced points 65 and 66 of the government’s policy document, calling for their immediate removal.
KATHMANDU: The Nepal Teachers’ Federation has strongly objected to the government’s newly announced policies and programs, accusing them of undermining the dignity and autonomy of community schools.
In a statement issued this week, the Federation specifically denounced points 65 and 66 of the government’s policy document, calling for their immediate removal.
According to the Federation, Point 65—concerning a proposed “Institutional-Community School Partnership Program”—portrays community schools as inferior and dependent by implying that educational quality in public schools can only improve through the involvement of institutional (private) schools. “This reflects a condescending view and promotes a dual education system, undermining the principle of equality and the core values of public education,” the statement read.
Similarly, the Federation has expressed serious concerns over Point 66, which proposes to “bring uniformity to the curricula of institutional and community schools.” The Federation argues that this suggestion indicates a lack of understanding on the part of the government regarding curriculum design and pedagogical practices. “The term ‘uniformity’ is vague, and without clarity, its implementation could lead to further confusion and inconsistencies in the education system,” the statement added.
The contentious provisions were part of the policy and program announcement presented by President Ramchandra Paudel to the Federal Parliament on Baisakh 19.
The broader document includes plans for virtual learning, student counseling, e-learning materials, and teacher training initiatives.
However, the Teachers’ Federation has dismissed these proposed reforms as damaging rather than constructive, arguing that they pose a threat to the existence and contributions of community-based education. “The Federation categorically rejects such notions,” the statement declared. “It is imperative that the government immediately withdraw these objectionable provisions.”
