Lawmakers call for clear distinction between Nepal Police & APF in new bill

KATHMANDU: Lawmakers have stressed the need for the Armed Police Force, Nepal Bill to clearly define the roles and jurisdiction of both Nepal Police and the Armed Police Force (APF).

Speaking during a meeting of the House of Representatives on Monday, they raised concerns over potential political interference in the operation of the APF if deployment is managed through the Chief District Officer.

Nepali Congress (NC) lawmaker Yogesh Bhattarai highlighted that the APF functions as a paramilitary force and should therefore operate within a clear chain of command, with the bill addressing promotions and transfers in a manner that ensures accountability. He emphasized that the APF should be managed and monitored by the federal government, the Ministry of Home Affairs, and the respective organizational heads.

“This bill should ensure the APF operates within its paramilitary structure, with clear oversight and accountability for promotions and career development,” Bhattarai said. “The Ministry of Home Affairs must take responsibility for providing guidance and oversight, ensuring that leadership is held accountable.”

CPN (Maoist Centre) lawmaker Bimala Subedi echoed concerns about political interference, noting that deploying the APF through the Chief District Officer poses a risk of misuse of power. She called for a bill that is aligned with the Constitution’s spirit, making the APF more accountable and independent from political influence. Subedi also pointed out the lack of clarity between the roles and jurisdictions of Nepal Police and the APF in the bill.

“The operation of the APF under the Chief District Officer could lead to political meddling and potential misuse of power,” Subedi warned. “We need to ensure that the APF operates in line with the Constitution, remaining free from such interference. The bill should clearly distinguish between the responsibilities and areas of operation of Nepal Police and the APF.”

Further, Nepali Congress lawmaker Shyam Kumar Ghimire expressed the view that the APF should operate in a manner akin to military forces, following a structured command system, and that distinctions between Nepal Police and the APF should be clear in the bill.

“The APF bill is drafted with a paramilitary approach, so its operation must follow a similar methodology,” Ghimire stated. “The bill needs to clarify the differences between Nepal Police and the APF, ensuring no overlap in responsibilities, which could lead to conflict.”

National Independent Party lawmaker Ganesh Parajuli also criticized the bill, noting that the proposals in the Nepal Police and APF Bills are identical, casting doubt on the intent behind these bills. He expressed concerns that the bills are being used to further political interests and undermine the federal structure.

The bill, introduced by Home Minister Ramesh Lekhak on Feb 9, is currently under discussion in the House. Lawmakers are expected to engage in further debates to resolve the issues raised.